Our Mission |
Please Support Energize America |
Get Cool EA Swag! |
What is EA 2020?
Contact Your Representatives...User loginLinksNavigationEA TeamSite Meter
|
Fee-bating toward an Energy Smart future: The French pathEnergize America has long had a FeeBate incorporated into it to encourage a more rapid move toward more fuel efficient, lower polluting vehicles. Charge a sliding FEE on low mileage, high polluting vehicles and give a reBATE to high mileage, low polluting vehicles. Balance this such that the collected Fees pay a good share of the reBate costs. Slowly, the FeeBate concept is gaining momentum around the world. Earlier this month, the French government announced a FeeBate system with the "Ecological Bonus" applying to vehicles with low CO2 emissions. The highest bonus, 5000 Euros (roughly $7500) applies to super-low emitters, less than 60 g de CO²/km which includes electric vehicles (especially in France, with so much of the electricity from nuclear power). The worst offenders will pay penalties of 2500 Euros. And, the regulations are planned with a constant strengthening, with 5 g de CO²/km reduction in each category every two years. In terms of bonus, the following is the initial regulation:
And, the penalties:
Trade-ins will be favored. Show up with a car over 15 years old and there is 300 € that the government will put on the table to retire the car. France is not unique Canada has the EcoAuto rebate program for which buyers (or someone signing a lease) can get $1000 or $2000 (by that way, that is real $s -- e.g., Canadian now). There is also an excise tax on fuel-inefficient vehicles, the Green Levy.
A FeeBate by any other name ... The Canadian system is directly related to fuel efficiency (which basically links back to CO2 emissions). The fees start above 13 liters per 100 kilometers (equates to or about 22 miles per gallon). This is not a very strict standard but is a start. 16 liters per 100 km and the fee hits $CAN 4000. NOW ... is this an option for California? Considering what the Bush Administration has done recently in trampling states' rights (again):
California is going back to courts and, in the meantime, it is prevented from moving forward with what could be called the CA CAFE standards to help lower pollution from new cars and increase gas mileage. Hmmmm... Would the EPA, the Federal Government have any right to have a say on California pursuing a FeeBate system within its rights to impose property taxes. Perhaps Ahnold should look to Canada, France, and Energize America for ideas on how to move forward toward less polluting vehicles on California's roads.
|
SearchLatest NewsNetroots Nation is going on right now - these links will take you to live blogs of the past two year's presentations: The Energy Smart Communities Act of 2007What people are saying about EA2020This is the most comprehensive package of energy proposals, bar none, on the table today. It costs Exxon Mobil tens of millions of dollars to come up with policy proposals like this on the other side of the ledger -- all it cost EA was thousands and thousands of hours of Recent blog posts
Who's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 0 guests online.
|